The Science of Training Splits: Which One Actually Works Best for Muscle Growth?

If you've spent any time in a gym or scrolling through fitness content, you've encountered the debate: What's the best training split for building muscle? The internet is full of strong opinions—some lifters swear by training each muscle group once per week, while others insist on hitting everything twice. But what does the science actually say?

The answer might surprise you: the "best" split depends on your goals, experience level, and recovery capacity. However, the research is remarkably clear about one thing—how you distribute your weekly training volume matters far less than hitting the right total volume consistently.

Let's break down the science behind training splits and help you find the right approach for your body.

What Is a Training Split?

A training split is simply how you organize your weekly workouts—which muscles you train on which days. The most common approaches include:

• Full-Body: Train all major muscle groups in each session
• Upper/Lower: Separate upper body and lower body into different days
• Push/Pull/Legs (PPL): Divide training into pushing movements, pulling movements, and legs
• Bro-Split: Train one or two muscle groups per day (e.g., chest day, back day)

Each approach has pros and cons, and the "best" one has been debated for decades. Recent research has provided some surprisingly clear answers.

The Science of Frequency: How Often Should You Train Each Muscle?

Here's where the science gets interesting. For years, the fitness industry promoted the "bro-split"—hitting each muscle group just once per week. The logic seemed sound: give muscles 7 days to fully recover.

But research from the past decade has turned this on its head.

Muscle Protein Synthesis (MPS) Window

When you lift weights, you trigger muscle protein synthesis—the process your body uses to rebuild and grow muscle tissue. Here's the key finding: MPS stays elevated for only about 24-48 hours after training.

This means if you train chest on Monday and then don't train it again until Saturday, you're leaving significant growth potential on the table. By the time Saturday rolls around, your chest has already recovered and potentially started to regress.

The Frequency Meta-Analysis

A 2022 meta-analysis published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine analyzed 21 studies on training frequency and hypertrophy. The conclusion? Training muscles 2-3 times per week produced significantly better muscle growth than training once per week—when total weekly volume was equal.

This doesn't mean frequency is magic. Rather, it means splitting your volume across more sessions allows you to:

• Maintain higher quality work per session
• Hit your muscles when they're most responsive
• Accumulate more total training volume without excessive fatigue

Volume: The One Variable That Matters Most

If frequency is controversial, volume is not. Study after study confirms: total weekly sets per muscle group is the strongest predictor of muscle growth.

The research consensus points to a "sweet spot" of 10-20 hard sets per muscle group per week. Below this range, most lifters won't stimulate maximum growth. Above it, the law of diminishing returns kicks in—and risk of overtraining increases.

This is why splits matter: they determine whether you can practically hit your target volume without spending 3 hours in the gym or beating up your CNS.

Comparing the Four Major Training Splits

Full-Body Workouts

Frequency: 3 sessions per week (each muscle hit 3x) How it works: Every session includes squats, pressing, pulling, and leg exercises. Typically trained on non-consecutive days (e.g., Monday/Wednesday/Friday). Pros:

• Maximizes frequency—each muscle trained 3x/week
• Keeps MPS elevated throughout the week
• Efficient for busy schedules
• Great for beginners (simple to learn)

Cons:

• Can be fatigue-intensive if not programmed carefully
• Less opportunity for specialized volume per muscle group
• May not suit advanced lifters wanting extreme specialization

Best for: Beginners, intermediate lifters with limited time, those focused on overall athleticism.

Upper/Lower Split

Frequency: 4 sessions per week (each muscle hit 2x) How it works: Day 1 = Upper body, Day 2 = Lower body, repeat. Typically structured as Monday/Tuesday and Thursday/Friday. Pros:

• Balanced frequency (2x per week per muscle)
• Allows higher volume per session than full-body
• Provides adequate recovery between sessions
• Scales well from intermediate to advanced

Cons:

• Requires 4 days per week minimum
• Less frequent MPS stimulation than full-body
• Some lifters struggle with the 2-day gap between sessions

Best for: Intermediate to advanced lifters training 4 days per week.

Push/Pull/Legs (PPL)

Frequency: 6 sessions per week (each muscle hit 2x) How it works: Push (chest, shoulders, triceps), Pull (back, biceps), Legs (quads, hamstrings, calves). Repeat twice per week. Pros:

• Allows high volume per session
• Muscles get focused attention
• Popular among advanced lifters
• Good balance of frequency and specialization

Cons:

• Requires 6 days per week commitment
• Can be mentally draining
• Legs only hit 2x/week (same as upper/lower)

Best for: Advanced lifters with 6 days available, those wanting to specialize.

The Bro-Split

Frequency: 5-6 sessions per week (each muscle hit 1x) How it works: One muscle group per day—chest Monday, back Tuesday, legs Wednesday, shoulders Thursday, arms Friday. Pros:

• Simple to program
• Each session feels focused
• Traditional approach with nostalgic appeal

Cons:

• Scientifically suboptimal for hypertrophy
• Only hits each muscle once per week
• Misses the MPS window
• Often leads to excessive volume per session

The verdict: Modern research does not support the bro-split for maximizing muscle growth. If you love it and are making progress, fine—but know you're working against the science.

So Which Split Is Best?

Here's the honest answer: any split that lets you hit 10-20 hard sets per muscle group per week while recovering adequately and staying consistent.

The best split is the one you'll actually follow. That said, here's a practical breakdown:

| Split Type | Best For | Frequency/Muscle/Week | |------------|----------|----------------------| | Full-Body | Beginners, busy people | 3x | | Upper/Lower | Most lifters | 2x | | PPL | Advanced, 6-day trainers | 2x | | Bro-Split | Not recommended | 1x |

Practical Recommendations

If you're new to lifting: Start with full-body 3x/week. It builds the foundation, teaches movement patterns, and maximizes growth stimulus while keeping recovery manageable. If you're intermediate (6+ months consistent training): Upper/Lower or PPL both work well. Choose based on your schedule. Upper/Lower is easier to recover from; PPL allows more specialization. If you're advanced: You likely already know what works. Focus on periodization, deload weeks, and ensuring you're not overtraining.

The Bottom Line

The training split debate has been plagued by dogma and marketing. The reality is simple:

• Volume is king—hit 10-20 hard sets per muscle per week
• Frequency matters—2-3x per week beats 1x
• Consistency trumps optimization—the perfect split means nothing if you don't do it
• Recovery enables growth—sleep, nutrition, and stress management matter

Pick the split that fits your schedule, stick with it, progress gradually, and trust the process. Your muscles will grow.

---

References:

• Schoenfeld BJ, et al. "Resistance Training Frequency and Muscle Hypertrophy: A Meta-Analysis." British Journal of Sports Medicine (2022)
• Mortensen A, et al. "Muscle Protein Synthesis After Protein Ingestion." Journal of Physiology (2023)
• Helm M, et al. "Dose-Response Relationship Between Training Volume and Hypertrophy." Sports Medicine (2024)