Why Not All Sets Are Equal: The Science of Effective Training Volume

If you track anything in the gym, it's probably sets and reps. You might log your weights, rest periods, and training frequency. But here's the uncomfortable truth: most of your tracked volume isn't doing anything useful.

Welcome to the concept of effective training volume—the idea that not all sets are created equal, and that blindly chasing higher set counts might be the least efficient approach to muscle building.

The Volume Illusion

The traditional view of hypertrophy programming has been simple: more sets = more growth. Ten sets per muscle group beats five. Twenty beats ten. This reasoning led to the "more is better" era of high-volume training, where some programs pushed 30+ sets per muscle group per week.

But research from the last few years tells a different story. A 2024 meta-analysis in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research found that the dose-response relationship between volume and hypertrophy follows a curve—not a straight line. Beyond a certain point, additional sets produce diminishing returns, and eventually, they may actually hinder progress.

The reason is deceptively simple: most sets performed in a typical workout are not challenging enough to drive adaptation.

What Makes a Set "Effective"?

An effective set for hypertrophy must meet three criteria:

• Proximity to failure: The set must be taken within 1-3 reps of failure (RIR 1-3). Sets performed far from failure—where you could do 5+ more reps—generate minimal muscle damage and minimal metabolic stress. They're practice sets, not growth sets.

• Appropriate loading: Using weights below ~30% of 1RM rarely produces meaningful tension, even to failure. The muscle needs sufficient mechanical load to activate the mechanotransduction pathways that trigger growth.

• Sufficient muscular tension time: The set must last long enough to accumulate metabolic stress. Very short sets (under 20 seconds total time under tension) don't generate enough of the cellular signals that promote hypertrophy.

When you run the numbers, a typical gym goer performing 15 sets per muscle group might only be completing 4-6 effective sets. The rest are junk volume—work that feels productive but fails to stimulate the mechanisms that actually build muscle.

The 2026 Approach: Quality Over Quantity

The emerging paradigm in hypertrophy training shifts focus from total volume to effective volume. Here's how this looks in practice:

Fewer Sets, Done Better

Rather than performing 20 sets of chest with mediocre effort, try 8-10 sets taken to true near-failure. The total number is lower, but the effective stimulus is higher. Studies show that 6-8 hard sets per muscle group per week produce equivalent or better hypertrophy than 15-20 moderate sets.

Track Effective Reps

Some researchers now recommend tracking "effective reps"—reps performed within the "growth zone" of 0-3 RIR. A set of 10 reps taken to failure contains roughly 3-4 effective reps. The same 10 reps stopped at RIR 6 contain zero effective reps.

This changes how you program. Instead of asking "how many sets?" ask "how many effective reps?"

Use Fatigue Management

Effective volume is limited by recovery capacity. You can only produce so many hard sets before neural fatigue degrades movement quality. The 2026 approach recognizes that managing fatigue—through appropriate deloads, sleep, and nutrition—allows you to consistently hit effective sets rather than grinding through junk volume.

Practical Application

Here's how to implement effective volume thinking:

Audit your current training. For each exercise, ask: "How many of my sets are truly challenging?" If you're stopping 2-3 reps short of failure because of arbitrary rep targets, you're wasting volume. Prioritize progressive overload of effective reps. Adding one effective rep per set over time beats adding three junk reps. Focus on getting slightly closer to failure on your last set, or adding 2.5kg while maintaining proximity to failure. Accept lower total volume. Programs designed around effective volume typically prescribe 8-12 sets per muscle group per week instead of 20. This feels underwhelming at first—but the results are often superior. Track what matters. Instead of obsessing over total sets, log RIR (reps in reserve) and estimate effective reps. Over time, you'll learn your actual effective volume threshold.

The Bottom Line

The shift from volume tracking to effective volume tracking represents a maturation of hypertrophy science. We're moving past the idea that the gym is a place to "accumulate workload" and recognizing that the goal is to stimulate adaptation—not simply to work hard.

Your muscles don't count sets. They respond to effective stimulus. Learn to deliver that stimulus efficiently, and you'll make better gains in less time.

---

Train smart. Not just hard.